Psychiatric genetics can be daunting for the non-expert. But it is so important for all mental health researchers and clinicians to have some understanding of where this field is at. Unlike much of the rest of psychiatric research and theory, modern genetics represents a firm foundation of valid and reliable knowledge. That knowledge is slowly unfurling how we think about psychiatric disorders such as ADHD, autism, depression, OCD, substance abuse, schizophrenia and bipolar.
A 2018 paper by Kendler and colleagues is an ideal overview, a straightforward, highly readable account of where things stand in psychiatric genetics, put in a historical context.
It has long been known that psychiatric illness runs in families. The heritability of psychiatric disorders (i.e. the degree of variance in a trait in a population which can be explained by genetics alone; a figure between 0 and 1) ranges from 0.3-0.4 for PTSD and depression, up to 0.7-0.8 for ADHD, autism, schizophrenia and bipolar. (Figure 1. Orange diagonal).
For the more genetic disorders (ADHD etc.) susceptibility very rarely comes down to one gene. Far more commonly, hundreds of individual genes are involved. Each gene, on its own, carries a tiny, almost negligible effect, at least in clinical if not statistical terms. But when a collection of risk genes is inherited, the chance of developing a psychiatric disorder starts to increase. For experts in psychiatric genetics, this is known as the polygenic risk score (PRS) the summed value of all the individual risk genes. The PRS is an important measure in modern psychiatric genetics.
Another important key-word is pleiotropy. This is when the same gene is involved in more than one psychiatric disorder. Pleiotropy has been recognized in psychiatry for some years. For example, a gene coding for a Ca2+ channel found on neurons, has long been known to constitute risk for a range of psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar, autism and major depression. Such knowledge is increasingly challenging the long-held view that there are discrete, neatly demarcated psychiatric disorders, as is found in the DSM and ICD classification systems.
Genetics researchers are now turning their attention to how a collection of genetic variants that increase the chances for one disorder (the polygenic risk score, PRS) may also increase the risk for other psychiatric disorders. This is pleiotropy at a higher level. The early findings again point to crossover between disorders. Kendler and colleagues elegantly illustrate the headline findings (Figure 1). The light blue squares show the genetic correlation between disorders using the methods of modern molecular genetics. The light orange squares show the genetic correlation between disorders using the more historical methods of family and twin studies.
For the present the main research effort will be to gather and pool more whole genome data from individual patients (and controls). Sample sizes of >100,000 will find more and more gene variants which confer risk for psychiatric disorders. Groups such as the multinational psychiatric genomics consortium (PGC) co-ordinate this task. Data-sets and computing resources are freely available to any researcher. Whether the traditional diagnostic systems collapse completely or remain in a different form cannot be know at present, but with modern molecular genetics, psychiatry is at last on a firm empirical and theoretical ground.